Comparison and Contrast of three essays Essay

We all know that reproduction is adept of the most important things in human life. A person needs to be better in order to take away a good future ahead of him. However, there are people who are less fortunate when it comes to education because they cannot commit to come to school. Today, learning is not a matter of gift to share however a wealth for some because they use education to gain bullion and not the aim of education for people. Because of these scenarios, some people hide their feelings of guilt and pity through text some of them are Nock, Vetter, and Mitchell. Nocks erudition of education in his article entitle The Disadvantages of Being Educated is opposite from the dictation of the society that education entrust lead to a better future. For Nock, education will lead to dissatisfaction of man. If a man is educated, he will search for more and would not be contented in what he has. He will continue to ask for more even if he has a good status in the society he wi ll seek for more fame and richness. Therefore, he would rather not be educated and live a simple and normal life rather than having a well-educated mind but not contented with everything. Vetters perception of authorship on the other hand in his article entitle Bonehead Writing is odd. He used to get wind people who want to learn how to write a good text, letter, or even a good paragraph because he perceived that writing is inbred and not something that can be learn for it is very hard especially for less fortunate and uneducated people. Once a person survived in a writing class, it is like surviving its life in the forest. For him, whether you take minutes, hours, or days of writing, it will still be senseless if you do not have the capability or the gift of writing. In the article of Mitchell, he showed the true meaning of hunger not the hunger of stomach but the hunger of mind. many an(prenominal) of the people in America is illiterate, though it is a first world country, th ere are still people who are uneducated that are uneffective to read and write. This kind of situation do him feel uncomfortable because America is known for being the first world country. However, he focused his attention to the job of educators because they are the one who took place and authority in teaching and educating the people preferably the students. These three authors of the said articles have different fight in their writing but their similarity is their purpose in their essay. All of them want to impose the needs and present situation of education not only in the united States but in the whole world as well. Nock relates his essay to the uneducated or less educated people because his attack is for educated people, it is a bias perception of the author towards the uneducated people can somehow help but not as always. Vetters attack focused on the needs of writing. He wants his readers to feel the incapacity of some people in writing.Through his ideas, his aim for change is not thoroughly established because he made the article too light to handle and because of this, readers would take it as an entertainment than being an educated article. On the other hand, Mitchell is the most serious writer of them all. Mitchell focused his full attention to the real situation of the world, though he wants to focus on Americas problem, it also relates to the problem of different countries. Mitchells attack towards the educators and other factors do not make a problematic argument because he delivers his perception and notion of hunger in a factual form. As a whole, they delivered well what they want to utter to the readers. They are different attacks but their aim are similar from one another, one of them bought entertainment while educating the readers, one takes the situation in academic environment with a light scenario, and one is serious in what he state. All of them made a revelation of what is happening, but the problem is that they do not state th e possible solutions to the problems they have encountered.ReferenceName. (date). Title. Publisher